While legislation seeking to ban asbestos recently moved from a House subcommittee to a full committee, two past Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrators decried the current agency and demanded passage of the bill.<\/p>\n
Gina McCarthy and William K. Reilly wrote a scathing op-ed in the New York Times criticizing the current EPA leadership and presidential administration over the handling of the asbestos crisis in the United States.<\/p>\n
The two put their weight behind the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act (ARBAN) that numerous democratic legislators introduced in March.<\/p>\n
\u201cLike the varmints in an old western movie, some rattlesnakes just won\u2019t stay dead. We thought we had relieved America of a death-dealing substance, asbestos, but it keeps finding its way into lungs with the aid of an accomplice,\u201d said the veteran environmental proponents in the editorial.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
McCarthy, the EPA\u2019s 13th administrator, and Reilly the sixth, asserted that the EPA currently stands as a friend to cancer-causing asbestos<\/a> which claims the lives of an estimated 40,000 Americans each year.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is painfully clear that despite the passage of the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act in 2016, which gave the EPA the authority and responsibility to address exposures to harmful chemicals, the current EPA is simply not going to do its job and ban asbestos,\u201d the editorial continued.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Former EPA Duo Championed Asbestos Ban<\/h2>\n
During their tenure, the two administrators fought hard to rid the country of the deadly substance. The op-ed chronicles their efforts, citing a 1989 ruling ten years in the making, that set a seven-year timeline to ban most asbestos uses under the Toxic Substances Control Act.<\/p>\n
Only two years later a federal appeals court overturned the agency ban after the asbestos industry filed a lawsuit challenging the ruling.<\/p>\n
The Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act restored the teeth of the EPA, but McCarthy and Reilly say the Trump-led agency \u201cexcluded from consideration important pathways of exposure and uses.\u201d<\/p>\n
Current Asbestos Rules Dangerously Lacking<\/h2>\n
Those pathways include construction materials used prior to the 1970s built into the infrastructure of millions of homes, exposure of firefighters when they enter burning buildings, and the deadly asbestos fibers in children\u2019s products like crayons.<\/p>\n
Cancers like ovarian, colorectal, stomach, esophagus, larynx, and pharynx, scientifically connected to asbestos, also have been disregarded.<\/p>\n
Rather than ban asbestos imports from countries that still manufacture the lethal material, the current administration instead created a minimal requirement. The EPA needs only to be notified when there is a resumption of a discontinued use of the killer fibers.<\/p>\n
The editorial continued with startling information that the United States lags behind almost 70 other countries who have banned asbestos<\/a>.<\/p>\n
And worse, it cited the statistic that the U.S. imported twice as much raw asbestos in 2018 than it did the year before. The lethal mineral entered the country for use in the creation of chlorine and caustic soda produced at 15 chemical plants who have resisted non-asbestos technology.<\/p>\n
ARBAN Act in Summary<\/h2>\n